home
contact us
site map
disclaimer
privacy policy


Class Actions
  General Motors - Intake Manifold Gasket
 
Home
 
Documents

Pension Surplus

Bankruptcy and Insolvency

Other Cases





  Client Links


 Publications



 Our Firm


General Motors - Intake Manifold Gasket

For more information you may e-mail us at gmclassaction@kmlaw.ca or call us at 1-877-398-0497


GENERAL MOTORS CORPORATION AND GENERAL MOTORS OF CANADA LTD


Stewart v. General Motors

For the latest news and to complete our questionnaire, visit our dedicated website at www.gmcanadianclassaction.ca

Koskie Minsky LLP, Colin Stevenson and Harvin Pitch act together for the plaintiffs in a proposed national class action against General Motors of Canada Limited and General Motors Corporation. The claim alleges that the defendants manufactured, in the 1995-2003 model years, motor vehicles with a defective intake manifold gasket (IMG).

The IMG regulates the flow of air and fuel into the cylinder. The allegation is that the IMG degrades prematurely causing coolant to leak into the engine. In particular, the plastic used to manufacture the IMG facilitated corrosion because it permitted leakage from the coolant system. The IMG did not properly seal the engine, causing leaks to occur. Among other consequences, the coolant mixes with engine oil making the oil ineffective and damaging the engine. In some cases engines overheat and seize completely, creating a danger to the operator and occupants and requiring complete engine replacements.

The claim, therefore, is based primarily on negligence, including the failure to warn the class of the problems and to rectify the problems. The damages are difficult to assess but a claim has been made for restitution of the defendants' savings, which are estimated to be about $1,200,000,000 in Canada alone.

The plaintiffs' counsel has teamed up with counsel across the country to advance similar claims in most provinces. View the claims issued to date:

British Columbia, Alberta, Manitoba, Ontario, New Brunswick, Nova Scotia, Newfoundland.

Comparable actions in the United States have been hard-fought and continue to be pursued in various jurisdictions. In January 2006 a similar claim was certified as a class action in Missouri.

Status of the Proceedings

The plaintiffs have delivered a Motion Record in support of certification of this claim as a class proceeding, and the Defendants have delivered responding materials. The Certification Hearing, which was originally scheduled for December 3, 2007, has been adjourned to March 25, 2008 in light of settlement discussions proceeding between the parties.

If you have information about this problem please complete and remit our secure online questionnaire, or if you prefer, print out the questionnaire to submit by fax or mail. We direct you to www.gmcanadianclassaction.ca where you will find the link to the questionnaire.

Since the national claim was commenced in Ontario there has been an outpouring of interest by affected consumers across the country. We have assembled a national team of law firms to pursue this claim vigorously on your behalf. The following is the list of lawyers working with us, together with their websites and email addresses. For those of you who have already sent us information, we will forward it to the appropriate lawyers. If you have not yet completed the questionnaire and remitted it, you may send it to us or to your local law firm:

 British Columbia  Ward Branch
 Branch MacMaster
 www.branmac.com
 Alberta  C. Kenneth W. Kolthammer
 Kolthammer Batchelor & Laidlaw LLP
 www.kolthammer.com
 Saskatchewan  William A. Selnes
 Kapoor, Selnes, Klimm & Brown
 kapoor.selnes.law@sasktel.net
 Manitoba  Wayne P. Forbes
 Pollock & Company
 www.pollockandcompany.com
 Ontario  Colin P. Stevenson LLP
 Stevensons LLP
 www.stevensonlaw.net
 Quebec  Pierre Sylvestre
 Sylvestre Fafard Painchaud
 c/o www.stevensonlaw.net
 Nova Scotia  Jason P. Gavras
 Gavras Slone Lenehan
 jgavras@eastlink.ca
 New Brunswick  Howard A. Spalding, Q.C.
 Barry Spalding
 www.barryspalding.com
 P.E.I.  Paul J. D. Mullin, QC

 pjd.dmullin@pei.aibn.com
 Newfoundland and Labrador  Geoffrey Aylward
 Aylward, Chislett & Whitten
 www.acwlaw.ca
 Other jurisdictions

 bkirkland@stevensonlaw.net


Please note that there is no direct cost you. This action is proceeding on a contingency fee basis. Class members will not be required to pay any legal fees to the class action lawyers unless the class action is successful at trial or settled (on favourable terms to class members). The Court must approve any settlement and the amount and division of any legal fees paid to counsel.

If the action is certified, persons who do not wish to pursue their claims against the defendants or wish to pursue their claims on an individual basis may opt out of the class action and commence individual claims at their own expense.

Important Note:

This website has been developed to provide general information to potential class members.

The site is not designed to answer questions about your individual situation or entitlement. Do not rely upon the information provided on this website as legal advice in respect of your individual situation nor use it as a substitute for individual legal advice.

The information collected about potential class members will assist counsel in prosecuting the class action and assessing what damages were suffered by the class as a whole. Providing the information requested does not make you a client. The court will ultimately decide who will be included as a class member.

This website will be updated from time to time to provide potential class members with information as it becomes available.



Copyright © Koskie Minsky LLP, 2008