home
contact us
site map
disclaimer
privacy policy


Class Actions
  Etobicoke Hydro
 
Home
 
Court Documents

Pension Surplus

Bankruptcy and Insolvency

Other Cases





  Client Links


 Publications



 Our Firm


Etobicoke Hydro

For more info contact Kirk Baert at 416-595-2117


Class Action against Etobicoke Hydro-Electric Commission (now Toronto Hydro)


This matter was settled by the parties. The settlement was approved by the Court on October 24, 2002. Particulars of the settlement together with the settlement funds were mailed to those entitled in December 2002.

Background

We were retained by a committee of retirees, who represent approximately 69 retirees that were receiving insurance coverage under the Etobicoke Hydro Retiree Health and Dental Plans as of June 13, 1996, to represent them in a class action against Etobicoke Hydro.

The committee's claim alleged that Etobicoke Hydro breached its promise to pay 50% towards the cost of the retirees' health and dental premiums (the additional cost to each retiree being approximately $1,240.00 each year). They also claimed for additional costs incurred, or that would be incurred, as a result of the Ontario government cutbacks, which included deductibles for prescription drug coverage and maximum allowable dispensing fees per prescription.

Since 1988, Etobicoke Hydro's employment policy had been to pay 50% of the retirees' premiums for their health and dental plan. Then, in 1997 Etobicoke Hydro advised the retirees that they had instituted a new policy wherein they would no longer be paying their 50% share and that the former employees would be responsible for the full amount.

On March 6, 2001 the action was certified as a class proceeding under the Class Proceedings Act. A Notice of Certification was issued to those affected retirees.

The issue before the court was whether Etobicoke Hydro's agreement to pay the 50% constituted a "binding promise". There is case law from the Supreme Court of Canada which supports the proposition that an employer cannot amend its promise to provide retiree benefits after the employee has retired. The promise made while the employee is employed becomes part of the employment contract and therefore any later unilateral amendment by the employer is a breach of the employment contract.

Linked to the left are the court documents including the settlement documents for your perusal.



Copyright © Koskie Minsky LLP, 2008